Rural and Urban Health

Data Profile Number 7, January 2003

Visit profiles to view data profiles on chronic and disabling conditions and on young retirees and older workers.


Health care service use differs

The rural population is consistently less well-off than the urban population with respect to health. Differences between the two populations are not always substantial, however. The rural population is more likely to engage in risky health-related behaviors and to experience higher rates of chronic conditions and activity limitations. Rural residents are also more likely to be uninsured for longer periods of time, and are less likely than urban residents to receive some types of health care, including tests for various chronic conditions. Limited access to health care in rural areas is generally associated with the fact that there are fewer providers. This Profile compares people who live in a metro-politan statistical area (MSA) to those who do not (non-MSA). People who reside in a MSA are referred to as urban residents and those who live in a non-MSA are referred to as rural residents. About one-fifth of the U.S. population resides in a rural area. Larger differences between the rural and urban populations may be masked as a result of the way the data are reported. The use of broad "urban" and "rural" categories may mask some differences because of the substantial variations in population size and density. For example, a rural area may refer to a county with a city of 10,000 or more, or to a frontier area which has an extremely low population density, usually fewer than 6 people per square mile.

The rural population is somewhat less healthy than the urban population

A larger proportion of the rural population than the urban population reports fair to poor physical and mental health. For example, the proportion of rural residents reporting fair to poor physical health is almost one and a half times the proportion of urban residents.

Chronic conditions are somewhat more common among adults in rural areas

Differences in the proportions of adults in rural and urban areas with specific chronic conditions are small, but the pattern is consistent. The proportions of adults in rural areas with chronic conditions are slightly larger than their urban counterparts. For example, somewhat larger proportions of rural men and women report heart problems, compared to their urban counterparts (see Figure 1).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adults in rural areas experience higher rates of limitations

One-third of adults in rural areas, compared to less than one-quarter of adults in urban areas, report that they are limited in performing a major activity such as paid work, housework, or school. Among persons age 18 and older, larger proportions of rural residents than urban residents also report limitations related to social, recreational, or family activities.

Adults in rural areas are also more likely to report physical limitations. Some 14 percent compared to 9 percent in urban areas say that they have a physical limitation including difficulty walking 10 steps, 3 blocks, or 1 mile, lifting 10 pounds, standing for 20 minutes, bending or stooping, reaching over their head, or using their fingers to grasp (see Figure 2).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risky health behaviors are somewhat more common among adults in rural areas

Overall, slightly larger proportions of adults in rural areas, compared to those in urban areas, engage in risky health-related behaviors. For example, 26 percent of those residing in a rural area, compared to 23 percent of those residing in an urban area, currently smoke. And among adults who have consumed alcohol in the past year, a larger proportion of rural residents consume an average of 5 or more drinks in one day. Rural residents are also more likely to be overweight or obese and to abstain from regular exercise (see Figure 3).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adults in rural areas are less likely to be tested for chronic conditions

In general, smaller proportions of adults residing in a rural area than those residing in an urban area are screened for various types of cancer, including prostate, breast, colon, and skin cancer. Among men ages 50 and older, for example, some 82 per-cent of rural residents and 87 percent of urban residents have had a prostate exam. Also, half of urban residents age 50 and older have had a blood stool test for colo-rectal cancer, compared to 42 percent of rural residents age 50 and older.

Although the number of AIDS cases in rural areas is rising rapidly, rural residents age 18 and older are less likely to be tested for AIDS compared to urban residents (see Figure 4).1 Among adults with HIV/AIDS who reside in a rural area, almost three-quarters travel to an urban area to obtain their health care.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rural residents are more likely to be uninsured and stay uninsured for longer periods of time

Among the population under age 65, some 19 percent of rural residents and 16 percent of urban residents are uninsured. Rural residents tend to stay uninsured for longer periods of time than urban residents. Factors that may contribute to this disparity include the higher percentage of self-employed persons, small businesses, and agricultural enterprises in rural areas.3

Over one-third of rural residents, compared to about one-quarter of urban residents, have been uninsured for more than three years. A larger proportion of urban residents have never been insured, however (see Figure 5).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Health care expenditures are slightly higher for the rural population

Median total health care expenditures for the rural population -- $434 -- are slightly higher than those for the urban population -- $418. Rural residents pay a larger proportion -- 29 percent -- of their health care costs out-of-pocket than do urban residents -- 23 percent (see Figure 6).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


FEWER HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS ARE AVAILABLE IN RURAL AREAS

Less than 11 percent of physicians in the U.S. practice in rural areas, yet about 20 percent of the population resides in rural areas. Provider recruitment and retention problems in rural areas are related to several factors including lower salaries, geographic isolation from peers and educational opportunities, and fewer amenities such as schools and recreation. The Department of Health and Human Services recommends a provider-to-patient ratio of one primary care physician to every 2,000 individuals. Over 20 million rural Americans live in areas that have a provider-to-patient ratio of 1 to 3,500 or less and are federally designated as health professional shortage areas (HPSAs). More than 2,200 physicians are needed to remove the HPSA designation from all rural areas, but more than twice that number is needed to achieve the recommended ratio of 1 to 2,000 in these areas.4 The shortage of mental health professionals in rural areas is even more severe. More than three-quarters of the counties designated as federal mental HPSAs are rural.5


The rural population is less likely to receive dental care

Receipt of dental care differs between the urban and rural populations. Among adults ages 18 to 64, for example, some 66 percent of urban adults have been to the dentist in the past year, compared to 59 percent of rural adults. This disparity is likely related to the low supply of dentists in rural areas. There are 29 dentists per 100,000 residents in most rural areas, compared to 61 per 100,000 in urban areas.6

Employment rates are lower for people with COPD

The rural population is somewhat more likely than the urban population to use hospital services, including emergency room visits and overnight hospital stays. Some 10 percent of rural residents, compared to 8 percent of urban residents, have stayed overnight in the hospital in the past year (see Figure 7). The scarcity of primary care physicians in rural areas is one factor that may contribute to greater use of hospital services.

Among the population age 65 and older, those in rural areas receive fewer home health care services and have worse outcomes than those in urban areas. Rural elders are more likely to be hospitalized, for example.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


TELEMEDICINE CAN BRING SERVICES TO UNDERSERVED AREAS

Telemedicine offers the potential to provide health care services across vast distances to underserved urban and rural areas. Telemedicine is the use of electronic communication and information technologies to provide clinical care at a distance. It can provide individuals in rural areas access to teleconsultations with health care providers and specialists that otherwise may not occur. Telemedicine may also help attract and retain health care providers in rural areas by providing ongoing training and interaction with other providers.

The lack of insurance reimbursement has been a barrier to bringing telemedicine into underserved areas, but is likely to be less of a factor in the future. The Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Beneficiary Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 allows Medicare to fully reimburse the consulting physician in a teleconsultation with a patient and referring physician. The Act also permits Medicare to provide teleconsultations in all rural areas.8 As of June 2002, 18 states provided Medicaid reimbursement for telemedicine and 2 states were developing plans to cover telemedicine.9 Several states, including California, Louisiana, and Texas, have passed laws requiring private insurance companies to cover telemedicine.10


1. National Rural Health Association (1997). HIV/AIDS in America.

2. Schur, C. et al. (2002). "Where to Seek Care: An Examination of People in
Rural Areas with HIV/AIDS." Journal of Rural Health, 18(2): 337-47.

3. NRHA (1999). Access to Health Care For the Uninsured in Rural and Frontier America.

4. North Carolina Rural Health Research Program (1997). Facts About...Rural Physicians. Washington, DC: Federal Office of Rural Health Policy, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.

5. American Psychological Association (2000). The Critical Need For Psychologists in Rural America.

6. CDC (2001). Health United States, 2001: Urban and Rural Chartbook. Hyattsville, MD: NCHS.

7. Schlenker, M. et al. (2002). "Rural-Urban Home Health Care Differences Before the Balanced Budget Act of 1997." Journal of Rural Health, 18(2): 359-72.

8. MEDPAC (2001). Report to the Congress: Medicare in Rural America. Washington, DC: MEDPAC.

9. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (June 5, 2002). Medicaid and Telemedicine.

10. Orloff, T. (1998). State Challenges and Opportunities in Rural and Frontier Health Care Delivery. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association.


ABOUT THE DATA

Unless otherwise noted, the data presented in this Profile are from two national surveys of the United States civilian non-institutionalized population. The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), conducted annually by the National Center for Health Statistics, is the principal source of information on the health of the U.S. population. The 1998 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), cosponsored by the Agency for Health-care Research and Quality and the National Center for Health Statistics provides national estimates of health care use, expenditures, sources of payment, and insurance coverage.

ABOUT THE PROFILES

This is the second set of Data Profiles in the series, Challenges for the 21st Century: Chronic and Disabling Conditions. The series is supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. This Profile was written by Lee Shirey with assistance from Laura Summer. It is the seventh in the series. Previous Profiles include:

1. Screening for Chronic Conditions: Underused services

2. Childhood Obesity: A lifelong threat to health

3. Visual Impairment: A growing concern as the population ages

4. Cancer: A major national concern

5. Prescription Drugs: A vital component of health care

6. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A chronic condition that limits activities

The Center on an Aging Society is a Washington-based nonpartisan policy group located at Georgetown University's Institute for Health Care Research and Policy. The Center studies the impact of demographic changes on public and private institutions and on the economic and health security of families and people of all ages.